linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8] sched: fix init NOHZ

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130425163242.GC5828@dyad.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:	Thu, 25 Apr 2013 18:32:42 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org,
	mingo@...nel.org, fweisbec@...il.com, pjt@...gle.com,
	rostedt@...dmis.org, efault@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8] sched: fix init NOHZ_IDLE flag

On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 04:59:02PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On my smp platform which is made of 5 cores in 2 clusters, I have the
> nr_busy_cpu field of sched_group_power struct that is not null when the
> platform is fully idle. The root cause is:
> During the boot sequence, some CPUs reach the idle loop and set their
> NOHZ_IDLE flag while waiting for others CPUs to boot. But the nr_busy_cpus
> field is initialized later with the assumption that all CPUs are in the busy
> state whereas some CPUs have already set their NOHZ_IDLE flag.
> 
> More generally, the NOHZ_IDLE flag must be initialized when new sched_domains
> are created in order to ensure that NOHZ_IDLE and nr_busy_cpus are aligned.
> 
> This condition can be ensured by adding a synchronize_rcu between the
> destruction of old sched_domains and the creation of new ones so the NOHZ_IDLE
> flag will not be updated with old sched_domain once it has been initialized.
> But this solution introduces a additionnal latency in the rebuild sequence
> that is called during cpu hotplug.
> 
> As suggested by Frederic Weisbecker, another solution is to have the same
> rcu lifecycle for both NOHZ_IDLE and sched_domain struct.
> A new nohz_idle field is added to sched_domain so both status and sched_domain
> will share the same RCU lifecycle and will be always synchronized.
> In addition, there is no more need to protect nohz_idle against concurrent
>  access as it is only modified by 2 exclusive functions called by local cpu.
> 
> This solution has been prefered to the creation of a new struct with an extra
> pointer indirection for sched_domain.

> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>

Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>

Thanks for persisting!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/