[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFxxWXrQU4oZUbHOBBkvtF=pSxMvyF6sYU9xpSDarWV-=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 15:20:15 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>,
Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86 fixes for 3.9
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 2:44 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>
> - if (!sys_table->runtime->query_variable_info)
> + if (sys_table->runtime->hdr.revision < EFI_2_00_SYSTEM_TABLE_REVISION)
> return EFI_UNSUPPORTED;
Is a EFI 2.00 system table *guaranteed* to have that
"query_variable_info" function? The above adds the version check, but
removes the check for a NULL pointer.
And why the hell don't we have a real structure that has been filled
out properly, and instead apparently just do this "point to random
memory that doesn't necessarily have the full structure?
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists