[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130425161704.3f0fc3b6af55cf75acbc9d9e@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2013 16:17:04 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org,
tj@...nel.org, axboe@...nel.dk,
James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com, snitzer@...hat.com
Subject: Re: Bcache v. whatever
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 14:32:02 -0800 Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@...gle.com> wrote:
> Bcache: a block layer SSD cache
sparc64 gcc-3.4.5:
drivers/md/bcache/btree.c: In function `bch_btree_read':
drivers/md/bcache/btree.c:266: error: invalid operands to binary +
drivers/md/bcache/btree.c: In function `__btree_write':
drivers/md/bcache/btree.c:379: error: invalid operands to binary +
drivers/md/bcache/btree.c: In function `btree_node_free':
drivers/md/bcache/btree.c:980: error: invalid operands to binary +
drivers/md/bcache/btree.c: In function `btree_insert_key':
drivers/md/bcache/btree.c:1857: error: invalid operands to binary +
drivers/md/bcache/btree.c:1857: error: invalid operands to binary +
drivers/md/bcache/btree.c:1859: error: invalid operands to binary +
drivers/md/bcache/btree.c:1859: error: invalid operands to binary +
drivers/md/bcache/btree.c:1864: error: invalid operands to binary +
drivers/md/bcache/btree.c:1864: error: invalid operands to binary +
drivers/md/bcache/btree.c: In function `btree_split':
drivers/md/bcache/btree.c:1934: error: invalid operands to binary +
drivers/md/bcache/btree.c: In function `bch_btree_set_root':
drivers/md/bcache/btree.c:2159: error: invalid operands to binary +
drivers/md/bcache/btree.c: In function `bch_btree_search_recurse':
drivers/md/bcache/btree.c:2262: error: invalid operands to binary +
drivers/md/bcache/btree.c: In function `bch_btree_refill_keybuf':
drivers/md/bcache/btree.c:2330: error: invalid operands to binary +
due to
#define pbtree(b) (&bch_pbtree(b).s[0])
I don't know why this is happening (presumably a gcc glitch), but
returning an 80-byte struct by value from bch_pkey() and bch_pbtree()
is just gruesome. The compiler has to allocate the space on the caller
stack, pass a hidden pointer into the callee and the callee copies its
return value into that caller stack slot. It's slow and consumes stack.
Something different, please.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists