| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1366962706-24204-4-git-send-email-xi.wang@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 03:51:43 -0400
From: Xi Wang <xi.wang@...il.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Xi Wang <xi.wang@...il.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH net-next 3/6] ARM: net: bpf_jit_32: support BPF_S_ANC_SECCOMP_LD_W instruction
This patch implements the seccomp BPF_S_ANC_SECCOMP_LD_W instruction
in ARM JIT.
Signed-off-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@...il.com>
---
arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c | 64 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c b/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c
index 1a643ee..9bfce464 100644
--- a/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c
+++ b/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
#include <linux/if_vlan.h>
#include <asm/cacheflush.h>
#include <asm/hwcap.h>
+#include <asm/syscall.h>
#include "bpf_jit_32.h"
@@ -55,7 +56,8 @@
#define FLAG_NEED_X_RESET (1 << 0)
struct jit_ctx {
- const struct sk_filter *skf;
+ struct sock_filter *insns;
+ unsigned len;
unsigned idx;
unsigned prologue_bytes;
int ret0_fp_idx;
@@ -131,8 +133,8 @@ static u16 saved_regs(struct jit_ctx *ctx)
{
u16 ret = 0;
- if ((ctx->skf->len > 1) ||
- (ctx->skf->insns[0].code == BPF_S_RET_A))
+ if ((ctx->len > 1) ||
+ (ctx->insns[0].code == BPF_S_RET_A))
ret |= 1 << r_A;
#ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
@@ -181,7 +183,7 @@ static inline bool is_load_to_a(u16 inst)
static void build_prologue(struct jit_ctx *ctx)
{
u16 reg_set = saved_regs(ctx);
- u16 first_inst = ctx->skf->insns[0].code;
+ u16 first_inst = ctx->insns[0].code;
u16 off;
#ifdef CONFIG_FRAME_POINTER
@@ -279,7 +281,7 @@ static u16 imm_offset(u32 k, struct jit_ctx *ctx)
ctx->imms[i] = k;
/* constants go just after the epilogue */
- offset = ctx->offsets[ctx->skf->len];
+ offset = ctx->offsets[ctx->len];
offset += ctx->prologue_bytes;
offset += ctx->epilogue_bytes;
offset += i * 4;
@@ -419,7 +421,7 @@ static inline void emit_err_ret(u8 cond, struct jit_ctx *ctx)
emit(ARM_MOV_R(ARM_R0, ARM_R0), ctx);
} else {
_emit(cond, ARM_MOV_I(ARM_R0, 0), ctx);
- _emit(cond, ARM_B(b_imm(ctx->skf->len, ctx)), ctx);
+ _emit(cond, ARM_B(b_imm(ctx->len, ctx)), ctx);
}
}
@@ -469,14 +471,13 @@ static inline void update_on_xread(struct jit_ctx *ctx)
static int build_body(struct jit_ctx *ctx)
{
void *load_func[] = {jit_get_skb_b, jit_get_skb_h, jit_get_skb_w};
- const struct sk_filter *prog = ctx->skf;
const struct sock_filter *inst;
unsigned i, load_order, off, condt;
int imm12;
u32 k;
- for (i = 0; i < prog->len; i++) {
- inst = &(prog->insns[i]);
+ for (i = 0; i < ctx->len; i++) {
+ inst = &(ctx->insns[i]);
/* K as an immediate value operand */
k = inst->k;
@@ -769,8 +770,8 @@ cmp_x:
ctx->ret0_fp_idx = i;
emit_mov_i(ARM_R0, k, ctx);
b_epilogue:
- if (i != ctx->skf->len - 1)
- emit(ARM_B(b_imm(prog->len, ctx)), ctx);
+ if (i != ctx->len - 1)
+ emit(ARM_B(b_imm(ctx->len, ctx)), ctx);
break;
case BPF_S_MISC_TAX:
/* X = A */
@@ -845,6 +846,19 @@ b_epilogue:
off = offsetof(struct sk_buff, queue_mapping);
emit(ARM_LDRH_I(r_A, r_skb, off), ctx);
break;
+#ifdef CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER
+ case BPF_S_ANC_SECCOMP_LD_W:
+ if (k == offsetof(struct seccomp_data, arch)) {
+ emit_mov_i(r_A, AUDIT_ARCH_ARM, ctx);
+ break;
+ }
+ ctx->seen |= SEEN_CALL;
+ emit_mov_i(ARM_R3, (u32)seccomp_bpf_load, ctx);
+ emit_mov_i(ARM_R0, k, ctx);
+ emit_blx_r(ARM_R3, ctx);
+ emit(ARM_MOV_R(r_A, ARM_R0), ctx);
+ break;
+#endif
default:
return -1;
}
@@ -858,22 +872,24 @@ b_epilogue:
}
-void bpf_jit_compile(struct sk_filter *fp)
+bpf_func_t bpf_jit_compile(struct sock_filter *filter, unsigned int flen)
{
struct jit_ctx ctx;
unsigned tmp_idx;
unsigned alloc_size;
+ bpf_func_t bpf_func = sk_run_filter;
if (!bpf_jit_enable)
- return;
+ return bpf_func;
memset(&ctx, 0, sizeof(ctx));
- ctx.skf = fp;
- ctx.ret0_fp_idx = -1;
+ ctx.insns = filter;
+ ctx.len = flen;
+ ctx.ret0_fp_idx = -1;
- ctx.offsets = kzalloc(4 * (ctx.skf->len + 1), GFP_KERNEL);
+ ctx.offsets = kzalloc(4 * (ctx.len + 1), GFP_KERNEL);
if (ctx.offsets == NULL)
- return;
+ return bpf_func;
/* fake pass to fill in the ctx->seen */
if (unlikely(build_body(&ctx)))
@@ -919,12 +935,12 @@ void bpf_jit_compile(struct sk_filter *fp)
if (bpf_jit_enable > 1)
/* there are 2 passes here */
- bpf_jit_dump(fp->len, alloc_size, 2, ctx.target);
+ bpf_jit_dump(ctx.len, alloc_size, 2, ctx.target);
- fp->bpf_func = (void *)ctx.target;
+ bpf_func = (void *)ctx.target;
out:
kfree(ctx.offsets);
- return;
+ return bpf_func;
}
static void bpf_jit_free_worker(struct work_struct *work)
@@ -932,12 +948,10 @@ static void bpf_jit_free_worker(struct work_struct *work)
module_free(NULL, work);
}
-void bpf_jit_free(struct sk_filter *fp)
+void bpf_jit_free(bpf_func_t bpf_func)
{
- struct work_struct *work;
-
- if (fp->bpf_func != sk_run_filter) {
- work = (struct work_struct *)fp->bpf_func;
+ if (bpf_func != sk_run_filter) {
+ struct work_struct *work = (struct work_struct *)bpf_func;
INIT_WORK(work, bpf_jit_free_worker);
schedule_work(work);
--
1.8.1.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists