[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130426105431.GF8669@dyad.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 12:54:31 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
LAK <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Santosh <santosh.shilimkar@...com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Chander Kashyap <chander.kashyap@...aro.org>,
"cmetcalf@...era.com" <cmetcalf@...era.com>,
"tony.luck@...el.com" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 5/6] sched: pack the idle load balance
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 08:30:58AM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> For x86 we should not be setting such flag then; we don't have a way for some cpu packages to
> go to an extra deep power state if they're completely idle.
> (this afaik is true for both Intel and AMD)
You say 'some'; this implies we do for others, right?
We can dynamically set the required flags in the arch setup when it makes sense.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists