[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKU6vyZfYR-2408G0_Fkp-PS5x5rMH+s4_OOWqqi7Nt+UfiUPg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 10:50:06 -0400
From: Xi Wang <xi.wang@...il.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 2/6] x86: bpf_jit_comp: support
BPF_S_ANC_SECCOMP_LD_W instruction
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-04-26 at 03:51 -0400, Xi Wang wrote:
>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER
>> + case BPF_S_ANC_SECCOMP_LD_W:
>> + if (K == offsetof(struct seccomp_data, arch)) {
>> + int arch = syscall_get_arch(current, NULL);
>> +
>> + EMIT1_off32(0xb8, arch); /* mov arch,%eax */
>> + break;
>> + }
>> + func = (u8 *)seccomp_bpf_load;
>> + t_offset = func - (image + addrs[i]);
>> + EMIT1_off32(0xbf, K); /* mov imm32,%edi */
>> + EMIT1_off32(0xe8, t_offset); /* call seccomp_bpf_load */
>> + break;
>> +#endif
>
> This seems seriously wrong to me.
Can you elaborate?
> This cannot have been tested at all.
Thanks to QEMU for hiding bugs then. :)
- xi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists