[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130426190327.GC1433@mtj.dyndns.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 12:03:33 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: scameron@...rdog.cce.hp.com
Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, neilb@...e.de, hch@...radead.org,
jmoyer@...hat.com, hare@...e.de, vgoyal@...hat.com,
stephenmcameron@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
lsorense@...lub.uwaterloo.ca
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] block: Add new generic block device naming interface
hey,
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 05:12:20PM -0500, scameron@...rdog.cce.hp.com wrote:
> It looks like these are called from a function called init_device_map()
> that is called from grub_stage2() at least in the version of grub I looked
> at (0.97, from rhel6).
>
> So my assumption is that adding a new block driver with yet another name space
> would require adding another bit of code into grub like those above. When I
> asked about "best practices" for new block driver device names on the grub devel
> mailing list to minimize required changes to grub, nobody argued against that
> assumption.
I think we kinda need to get down to the root cause of the issue.
Nothing against giving common names to devices in itself but there's a
non-insigificant chance that we end up with something half-way if the
original problem isn't properly understodd.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists