linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] process cputimer is moving faster than its corresponding clock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <517AD0AE.1030404@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 26 Apr 2013 15:08:30 -0400
From:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>
To:	Olivier Langlois <olivier@...llion01.com>
CC:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, schwidefsky@...ibm.com,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] process cputimer is moving faster than its corresponding
 clock

> I need to add that I can only confirm that to be true with
> sum_exec_runtime.
> 
> To affirm it to be true for stime and utime would require more
> investigation. I didn't look them at all. I was only concerned with
> sum_exec_runtime.
> 
> I will prepare a v2 of the patch accounting all the feedbacks that I
> received from KOSAKI Motohiro, Frederic Weisbecker and Peter Zijlstra
> and send it back here for further discussion.
> 
> Thank you very much all!

Do you mean your utime test case still failure? If you share your test-case, 
I'm going to look at your issue too.


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/