lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 26 Apr 2013 23:08:11 +0100
From:	Seoras Macdonald <seoras1@...il.com>
To:	bhelgaas@...gle.com
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Seoras Macdonald <seoras1@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH] gpu: vga: vgaarb: Ran checkpatch, fixed some warnings

Fixed some warnings generated by checkpatch and
adjusted some comment blocks to match the coding style.

Signed-off-by: Seoras Macdonald <seoras1@...il.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/vga/vgaarb.c |   67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/vga/vgaarb.c b/drivers/gpu/vga/vgaarb.c
index e893f6e..b3350ba 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/vga/vgaarb.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/vga/vgaarb.c
@@ -136,7 +136,6 @@ struct pci_dev *vga_default_device(void)
 {
 	return vga_default;
 }
-
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vga_default_device);
 
 void vga_set_default_device(struct pci_dev *pdev)
@@ -296,9 +295,8 @@ enable_them:
 
 	pci_set_vga_state(vgadev->pdev, true, pci_bits, flags);
 
-	if (!vgadev->bridge_has_one_vga) {
+	if (!vgadev->bridge_has_one_vga)
 		vga_irq_set_state(vgadev, true);
-	}
 	vgadev->owns |= (wants & vgadev->decodes);
 lock_them:
 	vgadev->locks |= (rsrc & VGA_RSRC_LEGACY_MASK);
@@ -483,15 +481,20 @@ static void vga_arbiter_check_bridge_sharing(struct vga_device *vgadev)
 
 			/* see if the share a bridge with this device */
 			if (new_bridge == bridge) {
-				/* if their direct parent bridge is the same
-				   as any bridge of this device then it can't be used
-				   for that device */
+				/*
+				 * if their direct parent bridge is the same
+				 * as any bridge of this device then it can't
+				 * be used for that device
+				 */
 				same_bridge_vgadev->bridge_has_one_vga = false;
 			}
 
 			/* now iterate the previous devices bridge hierarchy */
-			/* if the new devices parent bridge is in the other devices
-			   hierarchy then we can't use it to control this device */
+			/*
+			 * if the new devices parent bridge is in the other
+			 * devices hierarchy then we can't use it to control
+			 * this device
+			 */
 			while (bus) {
 				bridge = bus->self;
 				if (bridge) {
@@ -840,7 +843,7 @@ static int vga_pci_str_to_vars(char *buf, int count, unsigned int *domain,
 	return 1;
 }
 
-static ssize_t vga_arb_read(struct file *file, char __user * buf,
+static ssize_t vga_arb_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf,
 			    size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
 {
 	struct vga_arb_private *priv = file->private_data;
@@ -855,7 +858,8 @@ static ssize_t vga_arb_read(struct file *file, char __user * buf,
 	if (lbuf == NULL)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
-	/* Shields against vga_arb_device_card_gone (pci_dev going
+	/*
+	 * Shields against vga_arb_device_card_gone (pci_dev going
 	 * away), and allows access to vga list
 	 */
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&vga_lock, flags);
@@ -871,7 +875,8 @@ static ssize_t vga_arb_read(struct file *file, char __user * buf,
 	/* Find card vgadev structure */
 	vgadev = vgadev_find(pdev);
 	if (vgadev == NULL) {
-		/* Wow, it's not in the list, that shouldn't happen,
+		/*
+		 * Wow, it's not in the list, that shouldn't happen,
 		 * let's fix us up and return invalid card
 		 */
 		if (pdev == priv->target)
@@ -907,7 +912,7 @@ done:
  * TODO: To avoid parsing inside kernel and to improve the speed we may
  * consider use ioctl here
  */
-static ssize_t vga_arb_write(struct file *file, const char __user * buf,
+static ssize_t vga_arb_write(struct file *file, const char __user *buf,
 			     size_t count, loff_t *ppos)
 {
 	struct vga_arb_private *priv = file->private_data;
@@ -984,12 +989,13 @@ static ssize_t vga_arb_write(struct file *file, const char __user * buf,
 				ret_val = -EPROTO;
 				goto done;
 			}
-			/* TODO: Add this?
-			   if (io_state == VGA_RSRC_NONE) {
-			   ret_val = -EPROTO;
-			   goto done;
-			   }
-			  */
+			/*
+			 * TODO: Add this?
+			 * if (io_state == VGA_RSRC_NONE) {
+			 * ret_val = -EPROTO;
+			 * goto done;
+			 * }
+			 */
 		}
 
 		pdev = priv->target;
@@ -1036,11 +1042,12 @@ static ssize_t vga_arb_write(struct file *file, const char __user * buf,
 			ret_val = -EPROTO;
 			goto done;
 		}
-		/* TODO: Add this?
-		   if (io_state == VGA_RSRC_NONE) {
-		   ret_val = -EPROTO;
-		   goto done;
-		   }
+		/*
+		 * TODO: Add this?
+		 * if (io_state == VGA_RSRC_NONE) {
+		 * ret_val = -EPROTO;
+		 * goto done;
+		 * }
 		 */
 
 		pdev = priv->target;
@@ -1158,7 +1165,7 @@ done:
 	return ret_val;
 }
 
-static unsigned int vga_arb_fpoll(struct file *file, poll_table * wait)
+static unsigned int vga_arb_fpoll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
 {
 	struct vga_arb_private *priv = file->private_data;
 
@@ -1270,9 +1277,11 @@ static int pci_notify(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long action,
 
 	pr_debug("%s\n", __func__);
 
-	/* For now we're only intereted in devices added and removed. I didn't
+	/*
+	 * For now we're only intereted in devices added and removed. I didn't
 	 * test this thing here, so someone needs to double check for the
-	 * cases of hotplugable vga cards. */
+	 * cases of hotplugable vga cards.
+	 */
 	if (action == BUS_NOTIFY_ADD_DEVICE)
 		notify = vga_arbiter_add_pci_device(pdev);
 	else if (action == BUS_NOTIFY_DEL_DEVICE)
@@ -1312,8 +1321,10 @@ static int __init vga_arb_device_init(void)
 
 	bus_register_notifier(&pci_bus_type, &pci_notifier);
 
-	/* We add all pci devices satisfying vga class in the arbiter by
-	 * default */
+	/*
+	 * We add all pci devices satisfying vga class in the arbiter by
+	 * default
+	 */
 	pdev = NULL;
 	while ((pdev =
 		pci_get_subsys(PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID, PCI_ANY_ID,
-- 
1.7.10.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ