linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 3/3] ARM: net: bpf_jit_32: support BPF_S_ANC_SECCOMP_LD

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <517B6FC5.7070003@redhat.com>
Date:	Sat, 27 Apr 2013 08:27:17 +0200
From:	Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
To:	Xi Wang <xi.wang@...il.com>
CC:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
	Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	David Laight <david.laight@...lab.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@...ebox.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 net-next 3/3] ARM: net: bpf_jit_32: support BPF_S_ANC_SECCOMP_LD_W
 instruction

On 04/27/2013 04:17 AM, Xi Wang wrote:
> This patch implements the seccomp BPF_S_ANC_SECCOMP_LD_W instruction
> in ARM JIT.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xi Wang <xi.wang@...il.com>
> Cc: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@...hat.com>
> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
> Cc: Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>
> Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
> Cc: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
> Cc: David Laight <david.laight@...lab.com>
> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Nicolas Schichan <nschichan@...ebox.fr>
> ---
>   arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c b/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c
> index 073b085..9bfce464 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/net/bpf_jit_32.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
>   #include <linux/if_vlan.h>
>   #include <asm/cacheflush.h>
>   #include <asm/hwcap.h>
> +#include <asm/syscall.h>
>
>   #include "bpf_jit_32.h"
>
> @@ -845,6 +846,19 @@ b_epilogue:
>   			off = offsetof(struct sk_buff, queue_mapping);
>   			emit(ARM_LDRH_I(r_A, r_skb, off), ctx);
>   			break;
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SECCOMP_FILTER
> +		case BPF_S_ANC_SECCOMP_LD_W:
> +			if (k == offsetof(struct seccomp_data, arch)) {
> +				emit_mov_i(r_A, AUDIT_ARCH_ARM, ctx);
> +				break;
> +			}

Not an expert in ARM, but ...

Arent't you doing here a similar thing in terms of getting arch as Eric
criticized (Nicolas' implementation does not use that part btw.)? Also,
even if it would be possible here, now your 2 JIT implementations differ
in behaviour. I think this is unintended.

Besides all that, I think I also pointed you to a patch that already made
it in for ARM, not sure why you keep posting the ARM JIT implementation?

> +			ctx->seen |= SEEN_CALL;
> +			emit_mov_i(ARM_R3, (u32)seccomp_bpf_load, ctx);
> +			emit_mov_i(ARM_R0, k, ctx);
> +			emit_blx_r(ARM_R3, ctx);
> +			emit(ARM_MOV_R(r_A, ARM_R0), ctx);
> +			break;
> +#endif
>   		default:
>   			return -1;
>   		}
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/