[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130428190541.GA2301@pd.tnic>
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2013 21:05:41 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: vitalif@...rcmc.ru
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
"Venkatesh Pallipadi (Venki)" <venki@...gle.com>,
700333@...s.debian.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Clemens Ladisch <clemens@...isch.de>
Subject: Re: Bug#700333: Stack trace
On Sun, Apr 28, 2013 at 05:26:07PM +0400, vitalif@...rcmc.ru wrote:
> >When you do a suspend/resume cycle.
>
> OK, yes, I've found it there.
>
> >The bug says "The photo shows a BUG in hrtimer_interrupt() after
> >making
> >the hibernation image and while resuming the non-boot CPUs." so I'm
> >guessing with Thomas' patch it suspends fine now?
>
> Yeah, now I'm using a patched kernel and it's OK.
>
> So, does it mean the problem is fixed by this patch or it's just
> confirmed and should be fixed by another one?
Well, it makes sense to me, at least: we remove the handler on suspend
so that the HPET interrupt doesn't fire. If, when the box comes up
again, the pending interrupt is cleared, then all is fine - we can
safely register the handler again and everyone goes about their merry
way.
But don't worry, if Thomas has an idea, it is almost guaranteed you'll
get a proper fix soon. :-)
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists