[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130429095735.bbc99fd1444dbd756b645979@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 09:57:35 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: "Yuval Mintz" <yuvalmin@...adcom.com>
Cc: "David Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Ariel Elior" <ariele@...adcom.com>,
"Eilon Greenstein" <eilong@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree
Hi,
On Sun, 28 Apr 2013 16:49:33 +0300 "Yuval Mintz" <yuvalmin@...adcom.com> wrote:
>
> > Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in
> > drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c between commit
> > ecf01c22be03 ("bnx2x: Prevent NULL pointer dereference in kdump") from
> > the net tree and commit 5b0752c863d7 ("bnx2x: Fix VF statistics") from
> > the net-next tree.
> >
> > I am not sure about this, but I just used the net tree version but I
> > assume something more may be needed and can carry the fix as
> > necessary (no action is required).
>
> This patch adds the missing functionality from the `net-next' patch
> which was lost due to the merge.
Thanks.
> Is `linux-next' the correct tree to send it into?
> (I couldn't designate it to `net-next' as the merge between `net' and
> `net-next' hasn't occured yet, thus no collision there)
I have added this hunk to the merge conflict resolution in linux-next. I
assume that Dave will do this as well when he merges the net tree into
the net-next tree.
> Signed-off-by: Yuval Mintz <yuvalmin@...adcom.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ariel Elior <ariele@...adcom.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c index
> 06dee5c..52cf71c 100644 ---
> a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c +++
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnx2x/bnx2x_main.c @@ -6053,6 +6053,8
> @@ void bnx2x_pre_irq_nic_init(struct bnx2x *bp) bnx2x_init_def_sb(bp);
> bnx2x_update_dsb_idx(bp);
> bnx2x_init_sp_ring(bp);
> + } else {
> + bnx2x_memset_stats(bp);
> }
> }
This patch was badly corrupted ...
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists