[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <CA52A586-E4DF-42D0-9020-D17F8822BF7C@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 10:53:37 -0400
From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Simo Sorce <simo@...hat.com>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the nfsd tree
On Apr 28, 2013, at 9:24 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi J.,
>
> After merging the nfsd tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
>
> net/sunrpc/auth_gss/svcauth_gss.c: In function 'gss_proxy_save_rsc':
> net/sunrpc/auth_gss/svcauth_gss.c:1182:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'gss_mech_get_by_OID' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>
> Caused byc ommit 030d794bf498 ("SUNRPC: Use gssproxy upcall for server
> RPCGSS authentication"). gss_mech_get_by_OID() made static to
> net/sunrpc/auth_gss/gss_mech_switch.c by commit 9568c5e9a61d ("SUNRPC:
> Introduce rpcauth_get_pseudoflavor()") in the nfs tree (part of the nfs
> tree that you did not merge).
>
> I don't know how to fix this, so I have used the nfsd tree from
> next-20130426 for today.
Bruce, it might make sense for me to submit the three server-side RPC GSS patches, and then you can rebase the gssproxy work on top of those. Let me know how you would like to proceed.
--
Chuck Lever
chuck[dot]lever[at]oracle[dot]com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists