linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the nfsd tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1367252960.10084.491.camel@willson.li.ssimo.org>
Date:	Mon, 29 Apr 2013 12:29:20 -0400
From:	Simo Sorce <simo@...hat.com>
To:	Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
Cc:	"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the nfsd tree

On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 12:05 -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> On Apr 29, 2013, at 11:45 AM, "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 10:53:37AM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> >> 
> >> On Apr 28, 2013, at 9:24 PM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >> 
> >>> Hi J.,
> >>> 
> >>> After merging the nfsd tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> >>> ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
> >>> 
> >>> net/sunrpc/auth_gss/svcauth_gss.c: In function 'gss_proxy_save_rsc':
> >>> net/sunrpc/auth_gss/svcauth_gss.c:1182:3: error: implicit declaration of function 'gss_mech_get_by_OID' [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> >>> 
> >>> Caused byc ommit 030d794bf498 ("SUNRPC: Use gssproxy upcall for server
> >>> RPCGSS authentication").  gss_mech_get_by_OID() made static to
> >>> net/sunrpc/auth_gss/gss_mech_switch.c by commit 9568c5e9a61d ("SUNRPC:
> >>> Introduce rpcauth_get_pseudoflavor()") in the nfs tree (part of the nfs
> >>> tree that you did not merge).
> >>> 
> >>> I don't know how to fix this, so I have used the nfsd tree from
> >>> next-20130426 for today.
> >> 
> >> Bruce, it might make sense for me to submit the three server-side RPC GSS patches, and then you can rebase the gssproxy work on top of those.  Let me know how you would like to proceed.
> > 
> > I'm happy to take those patches whenever you consider them ready.  Would
> > that fix the problem?
> 
> Someone would need to modify the gssproxy patches to use the new interfaces.
> 
> > Also: it looks like 030d794bf498 "SUNRPC: Introduce
> > rpcauth_get_pseudoflavor()" is in Trond's linux-next, but not his
> > nfs-for-next.  I'm not sure what that means--is it safe to rebase on top
> > of *that*?
> 
> That doesn't seem right to me.

GSS-Proxy patches are 1 year old and we've been delayed once already to
accomodate the containers work, maybe it's time for your patches to be
rebased on gssproxy ones ? :-)

Simo. 

-- 
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/