lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 29 Apr 2013 12:02:18 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [ 36/42] tcp: call tcp_replace_ts_recent() from tcp_ack()

3.8-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------


From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>

[ Upstream commit 12fb3dd9dc3c64ba7d64cec977cca9b5fb7b1d4e ]

commit bd090dfc634d (tcp: tcp_replace_ts_recent() should not be called
from tcp_validate_incoming()) introduced a TS ecr bug in slow path
processing.

1 A > B P. 1:10001(10000) ack 1 <nop,nop,TS val 1001 ecr 200>
2 B < A . 1:1(0) ack 1 win 257 <sack 9001:10001,TS val 300 ecr 1001>
3 A > B . 1:1001(1000) ack 1 win 227 <nop,nop,TS val 1002 ecr 200>
4 A > B . 1001:2001(1000) ack 1 win 227 <nop,nop,TS val 1002 ecr 200>

(ecr 200 should be ecr 300 in packets 3 & 4)

Problem is tcp_ack() can trigger send of new packets (retransmits),
reflecting the prior TSval, instead of the TSval contained in the
currently processed incoming packet.

Fix this by calling tcp_replace_ts_recent() from tcp_ack() after the
checks, but before the actions.

Reported-by: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Cc: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
Acked-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_input.c |   64 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -116,6 +116,7 @@ int sysctl_tcp_early_retrans __read_most
 #define FLAG_DSACKING_ACK	0x800 /* SACK blocks contained D-SACK info */
 #define FLAG_NONHEAD_RETRANS_ACKED	0x1000 /* Non-head rexmitted data was ACKed */
 #define FLAG_SACK_RENEGING	0x2000 /* snd_una advanced to a sacked seq */
+#define FLAG_UPDATE_TS_RECENT	0x4000 /* tcp_replace_ts_recent() */
 
 #define FLAG_ACKED		(FLAG_DATA_ACKED|FLAG_SYN_ACKED)
 #define FLAG_NOT_DUP		(FLAG_DATA|FLAG_WIN_UPDATE|FLAG_ACKED)
@@ -3572,6 +3573,27 @@ static void tcp_send_challenge_ack(struc
 	}
 }
 
+static void tcp_store_ts_recent(struct tcp_sock *tp)
+{
+	tp->rx_opt.ts_recent = tp->rx_opt.rcv_tsval;
+	tp->rx_opt.ts_recent_stamp = get_seconds();
+}
+
+static void tcp_replace_ts_recent(struct tcp_sock *tp, u32 seq)
+{
+	if (tp->rx_opt.saw_tstamp && !after(seq, tp->rcv_wup)) {
+		/* PAWS bug workaround wrt. ACK frames, the PAWS discard
+		 * extra check below makes sure this can only happen
+		 * for pure ACK frames.  -DaveM
+		 *
+		 * Not only, also it occurs for expired timestamps.
+		 */
+
+		if (tcp_paws_check(&tp->rx_opt, 0))
+			tcp_store_ts_recent(tp);
+	}
+}
+
 /* This routine deals with incoming acks, but not outgoing ones. */
 static int tcp_ack(struct sock *sk, const struct sk_buff *skb, int flag)
 {
@@ -3624,6 +3646,12 @@ static int tcp_ack(struct sock *sk, cons
 	prior_fackets = tp->fackets_out;
 	prior_in_flight = tcp_packets_in_flight(tp);
 
+	/* ts_recent update must be made after we are sure that the packet
+	 * is in window.
+	 */
+	if (flag & FLAG_UPDATE_TS_RECENT)
+		tcp_replace_ts_recent(tp, TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq);
+
 	if (!(flag & FLAG_SLOWPATH) && after(ack, prior_snd_una)) {
 		/* Window is constant, pure forward advance.
 		 * No more checks are required.
@@ -3940,27 +3968,6 @@ const u8 *tcp_parse_md5sig_option(const
 EXPORT_SYMBOL(tcp_parse_md5sig_option);
 #endif
 
-static inline void tcp_store_ts_recent(struct tcp_sock *tp)
-{
-	tp->rx_opt.ts_recent = tp->rx_opt.rcv_tsval;
-	tp->rx_opt.ts_recent_stamp = get_seconds();
-}
-
-static inline void tcp_replace_ts_recent(struct tcp_sock *tp, u32 seq)
-{
-	if (tp->rx_opt.saw_tstamp && !after(seq, tp->rcv_wup)) {
-		/* PAWS bug workaround wrt. ACK frames, the PAWS discard
-		 * extra check below makes sure this can only happen
-		 * for pure ACK frames.  -DaveM
-		 *
-		 * Not only, also it occurs for expired timestamps.
-		 */
-
-		if (tcp_paws_check(&tp->rx_opt, 0))
-			tcp_store_ts_recent(tp);
-	}
-}
-
 /* Sorry, PAWS as specified is broken wrt. pure-ACKs -DaveM
  *
  * It is not fatal. If this ACK does _not_ change critical state (seqs, window)
@@ -5556,14 +5563,9 @@ slow_path:
 		return 0;
 
 step5:
-	if (tcp_ack(sk, skb, FLAG_SLOWPATH) < 0)
+	if (tcp_ack(sk, skb, FLAG_SLOWPATH | FLAG_UPDATE_TS_RECENT) < 0)
 		goto discard;
 
-	/* ts_recent update must be made after we are sure that the packet
-	 * is in window.
-	 */
-	tcp_replace_ts_recent(tp, TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq);
-
 	tcp_rcv_rtt_measure_ts(sk, skb);
 
 	/* Process urgent data. */
@@ -5997,7 +5999,8 @@ int tcp_rcv_state_process(struct sock *s
 
 	/* step 5: check the ACK field */
 	if (true) {
-		int acceptable = tcp_ack(sk, skb, FLAG_SLOWPATH) > 0;
+		int acceptable = tcp_ack(sk, skb, FLAG_SLOWPATH |
+						  FLAG_UPDATE_TS_RECENT) > 0;
 
 		switch (sk->sk_state) {
 		case TCP_SYN_RECV:
@@ -6148,11 +6151,6 @@ int tcp_rcv_state_process(struct sock *s
 		}
 	}
 
-	/* ts_recent update must be made after we are sure that the packet
-	 * is in window.
-	 */
-	tcp_replace_ts_recent(tp, TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq);
-
 	/* step 6: check the URG bit */
 	tcp_urg(sk, skb, th);
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ