[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKfTPtAJJc5kcn07HrwB6FQmX+qyGFgMCOYsd3f6SWZP=Rpa5Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 09:32:30 +0200
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To: Francesco Lavra <francescolavra.fl@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
LAK <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Santosh <santosh.shilimkar@...com>,
Morten Rasmussen <Morten.Rasmussen@....com>,
Chander Kashyap <chander.kashyap@...aro.org>,
"cmetcalf@...era.com" <cmetcalf@...era.com>,
"tony.luck@...el.com" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>,
Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/14] sched: update the buddy CPU
On 28 April 2013 10:20, Francesco Lavra <francescolavra.fl@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 04/25/2013 07:23 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
>> Periodically updates the buddy of a CPU according to the current activity of
>> the system. A CPU is its own buddy if it participates to the packing effort.
>> Otherwise, it points to a CPU that participates to the packing effort.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
>> ---
>> kernel/sched/fair.c | 91 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 86 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> index 234ecdd..28f8ea7 100644
>> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
>> @@ -174,11 +174,17 @@ void sched_init_granularity(void)
>>
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>> +static unsigned long power_of(int cpu)
>> +{
>> + return cpu_rq(cpu)->cpu_power;
>> +}
>> +
>> /*
>> * Save the id of the optimal CPU that should be used to pack small tasks
>> * The value -1 is used when no buddy has been found
>> */
>> DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, sd_pack_buddy);
>> +DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct sched_domain *, sd_pack_domain);
>>
>> /*
>> * Look for the best buddy CPU that can be used to pack small tasks
>> @@ -237,6 +243,68 @@ void update_packing_domain(int cpu)
>> }
>>
>> pr_debug("CPU%d packing on CPU%d\n", cpu, id);
>> + per_cpu(sd_pack_domain, cpu) = sd;
>> + per_cpu(sd_pack_buddy, cpu) = id;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void update_packing_buddy(int cpu, int activity)
>> +{
>> + struct sched_domain *sd = per_cpu(sd_pack_domain, cpu);
>> + struct sched_group *sg, *pack, *tmp;
>> + int id = cpu;
>> +
>> + if (!sd)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * The sched_domain of a CPU points on the local sched_group
>> + * and this CPU of this local group is a good candidate
>> + */
>> + pack = sg = sd->groups;
>> +
>> + /* loop the sched groups to find the best one */
>> + for (tmp = sg->next; tmp != sg; tmp = tmp->next) {
>> + if ((tmp->sgp->power * pack->group_weight) >
>> + (pack->sgp->power_available * tmp->group_weight))
>
> The power_available struct member is defined in a subsequent patch
> (12/14), so this patch series would break git bisect.
Hi Francesco,
yes, power_available should have been added in patch 13/14.
I will correct that
Thanks
Vincent
>
> --
> Francesco
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists