[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <016501ce44af$03129c80$0937d580$%dae@samsung.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 16:56:10 +0900
From: Inki Dae <inki.dae@...sung.com>
To: 'Uwe Kleine-König'
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH] module: fix mutiple defined issue
Hi,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-kernel-owner@...r.kernel.org [mailto:linux-kernel-
> owner@...r.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Uwe Kleine-Konig
> Sent: Monday, April 29, 2013 4:35 PM
> To: Inki Dae
> Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; dri-
> devel@...ts.freedesktop.org; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] module: fix mutiple defined issue
>
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 02:32:01PM +0900, Inki Dae wrote:
> > This patch fixes mutiple defined issue to MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE
> s/mutiple/multiple/, still this sentence doesn't sound right. What is
> the error message you see?
>
> > The issue could be induced when some framework which includes two
> > more sub drivers, is built as one moudle because those sub drivers
> s/moudle/module/
>
> > could have their own MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE.
> >
> > And 'struct of_device_id' isn't needed to be determined by type
> > argument because the definition of 'of_device_id' should be fixed.
> > So this patch makes 'of_devce_id' definition to be fixed and
> > only its instance name to be defined by type.
> include/linux/isapnp.h uses:
> #define ISAPNP_CARD_TABLE(name) \
> MODULE_GENERIC_TABLE(isapnp_card, name)
>
> and you changed the table's type with your patch. Ditto for all users of
>
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, ...);
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, ...);
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(platform, ...);
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, ...);
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(sdio, ...);
>
> So I'm pretty sure your patch is wrong and I expect it makes most
> defconfigs fail to compile.
>
It might be my big mistake. Maybe xxx_device_id object was created device
tree internally. Right? Will check it out again. So please ignore it.
Thanks,
Inki Dae
> Best regards
> Uwe
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Inki Dae <inki.dae@...sung.com>
> > ---
> > include/linux/module.h | 2 +-
> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/module.h b/include/linux/module.h
> > index 46f1ea0..ac5d79f 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/module.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/module.h
> > @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ void trim_init_extable(struct module *m);
> >
> > #ifdef MODULE
> > #define MODULE_GENERIC_TABLE(gtype,name) \
> > -extern const struct gtype##_id __mod_##gtype##_table \
> > +extern const struct of_device_id __mod_##gtype##_table \
> > __attribute__ ((unused, alias(__stringify(name))))
> >
> > #else /* !MODULE */
> > --
> > 1.7.5.4
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> > linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
> >
>
> --
> Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
> Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists