[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <517F14D1.3070307@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 20:48:17 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: "Pierre-Loup A. Griffais" <pgriffais@...vesoftware.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
sonnyrao@...omium.org,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: IO regression after ab8fabd46f on x86 kernels with high memory
On 04/29/2013 06:03 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Seriously, you can compile yourself a 64-bit kernel and continue to
> use your 32-bit user-land. And you can complain to whatever distro you
> used that it didn't do that in the first place. But we're not going to
> bother with trying to tune PAE for some particular load. It's just not
> worth it to anybody.
I can think of one way to "tune PAE" that will help
avoid the breakage, and at the same time draw the
attention of users.
Limit the memory that a 32 bit PAE kernel uses, to
something small enough where the user will not
encounter random breakage. Maybe 8 or 12GB?
It could also print out a friendly message, to
inform the user they should upgrade to a 64 bit
kernel to enjoy the use of all of their memory.
It is a bit of a heavy stick, but I suspect that
it would clue in all of the affected users.
If you have no objection to this, I'll whip up a
patch.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists