[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdXYaDHYq7CG8ftP+yyF18pMx8qZrvM3AUTAXk+tUruNcA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 11:39:05 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Jon Medhurst <tixy@...aro.org>,
Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next build error (at91) - use of bool in mach/arch.h
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com> wrote:
> So, I am wondering if the best correction is to add the types.h header file
> in the asm/mach/arch.h file, like this:
>
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/mach/arch.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/mach/arch.h
> @@ -8,6 +8,8 @@
> * published by the Free Software Foundation.
> */
>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +
> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>
> struct tag;
>
> or if a better option would be to re-arrange the include directives in
> various at91xxx_devices.c files?
Include files should be self-contained, so asm/mach/arch.h is the right place.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists