[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130430101854.GI4563@zurbaran>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 12:18:54 +0200
From: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nicolas Pitre <nico@...xnic.net>,
Richard Kuo <rkuo@...eaurora.org>,
linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: MFD: move ssbi driver into drivers/mfd
Hi Arnd,
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 12:00:19AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> There is no reason for ssbi to have its own top-level driver directory
> when the only users of this interface are all MFD drivers. The only
> mainline driver using it at the moment (PM8921) is marked broken and in
> fact does not compile. I have verified that fixing the trivial build
> breakage in pm8921 links in the new ssbi code just fine, but that
> can be a separate patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/Kconfig | 2 --
> drivers/Makefile | 1 -
> drivers/mfd/Kconfig | 3 ++-
> drivers/mfd/Makefile | 2 +-
> drivers/{ssbi => mfd}/ssbi.c | 0
> drivers/ssbi/Kconfig | 16 ----------------
> drivers/ssbi/Makefile | 1 -
> 7 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
I suppose we don't expect any non MFD drivers to use this interface ? If
that's so, I'll take it through mfd-next.
Cheers,
Samuel.
--
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists