linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/9] crypto: ux500/cryp - Set DMA configuration though dma_slave

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130430100837.GB1960@intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 30 Apr 2013 15:38:37 +0530
From:	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus WALLEIJ <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.hengli.com.au>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Andreas Westin <andreas.westin@...ricsson.com>,
	"linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org" <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>,
	magnus.p.persson@...ricsson.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/9] crypto: ux500/cryp - Set DMA configuration though
 dma_slave_config()

On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:41:23AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 01:46:46PM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 10:28:39AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 4:11 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > The dma engine driver must know the address in its dma space, while the
> > > > slave driver has it available in physical space. These two are often the
> > > > same, but there is no generic way to convert between the two, especially
> > > > if the dma engine resides behind an IOMMU.
> > > >
> > > > The best assumption we can make is that the dma engine driver knows
> > > > how to convert between the two. Interestingly the documentation for
> > > > dma_slave_config talks about "physical address", while the structure
> > > > itself uses a dma_addr_t. Linus Walleij introduced the structure in
> > > > c156d0a5b0 "DMAENGINE: generic slave channel control v3", so I assume
> > > > he can shed some light on what he was thinking. I assume the documentation
> > > > is right but the structure is not and should be converted to use
> > > > phys_add_t or resource_size_t.
> > > 
> > > OK I could cook a patch for that, but I think I need some input from
> > > Vinod and/or Russell on this.
> > the dma_slave_config is physical address that should be passed directly to the
> > controller. Obviosuly it should phys_addr_t :)
> 
> What you've just said is actually confusing.
> 
> "physical address" is normally the term used to describe the addresses
> seen to the RAM.  phys_addr_t describes this.  This is not necessarily
> what needs to be programmed into the DMA controller.
Yes that would be true when you have MMU
> 
> For RAM addresses, they must be mapped via the DMA API - and this gives
> you a dma_addr_t.
> 
> "DMA address" is the address to be programmed into a DMA controller to
> access a particular address in RAM or device, and has type dma_addr_t.
> When you're programming a DMA controller to access a device, you are
> clearly telling it the address on the _DMA controller's bus_ to access
> that register, which may or may not be the same as the physical address.
> 
> There are platforms in existence where phys_addr_t can be 32-bit but
> dma_addr_t can be 64-bit.  Getting this stuff wrong can cause problems.
Sure, thanks for pointing, so we wont do this change.

--
~Vinod
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/