[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <14549764.SU5BpuG0MO@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 13:48:43 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arve Hjønnevåg <arve@...roid.com>,
Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] freezer: skip waking up tasks with PF_FREEZER_SKIP set
On Monday, April 29, 2013 03:16:24 PM Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 03:08:31PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > spent freezing by a factor of 5. It will have a similar effect on a
> > > non-Android system, although those generally don't care about
> > > suspend/resume optimization.
> >
> > Yeah, if it's something which makes actual difference rather than
> > "this seems to be a good idea" thing, sure, let's find a way.
>
> And a probably better approach would be rolling should_skip test into
> freeze_task() with a comment explaining the interlocking rather than
> adding should_skip test in its callers.
Agreed.
Thanks,
Rafael
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists