lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7b4ef246-c442-45e6-bc1e-0e1821f8fad9@email.android.com>
Date:	Tue, 30 Apr 2013 07:57:32 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CC:	Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
	Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] EFI merge botch fix

Yes, please send pull requests.

Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org> wrote:

>On 30/04/13 09:47, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> The other problem is that tip:x86/efi also conflicts with current
>-git, as 
>> of v3.9 - due to interaction with an EFI fix tree ...
>> 
>> This is getting ugly pretty fast, so I'd suggest to re-do the merges 
>> cleanly, not by rebasing the tree, but by redoing the first merge in 
>> essence:
>> 
>>   e29c2de5f591 Merge tag 'v3.9-rc8' into efi-for-tip
>> 
>> By correctly merging v3.9-final into f53f292 - making sure the
>changes to 
>> drivers/firmware/efivars.c correctly merge over, and making sure the
>ia64 
>> select does not get lost.
>> 
>> Something like this would do:
>> 
>>   git checkout -b x86-new-efi-branch f53f292
>>   git merge v3.9
>>   < ... resolve all the conflicts ...>
>>   git commit
>> 
>> I can then (non-fast-forward) fetch this new EFI branch as the new 
>> tip:x86/efi.
>
>OK, I re-did the merge against v3.9 as requested and published it as
>'efi-for-tip2'. Would you like me to send a proper pull request if
>that's easier to pull into the tip machinery?
>
>I have also started accumulating fixes against the EFI changes in
>tip/x86/efi. Would you like those as a separate pull request? The fixes
>branch is 'efi-for-tip-fixes' and is based on the above merge branch,
>'efi-for-tip2'. It mainly includes fixes for bugs in the pstore paths
>which Seiji Aguchi found.

-- 
Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse brevity and lack of formatting.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ