linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] scheduler changes for v3.10

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFwsv+p3wqx5eMr3iNPxmPZhSx-h5s5R7s9yd314Muajvg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 30 Apr 2013 09:27:12 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc:	Stanislaw Gruszka <sgruszka@...hat.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	"Fr?d?ric Weisbecker" <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] scheduler changes for v3.10

On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 9:23 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Linus, would you like me to revert d9a3c9823a2e and re-send the pull
> request?

I took the pull request, but I'd like to see the non-64-bit divide
version before the merge window ends. And with no more div_rem users I
think we should at least double-check that the new div64_u64() (that
uses the new div64_u64_rem) isn't noticeably slower than the old one.
If it is, we should revert that new (and then unused) div64 code too.

              Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/