[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0000013e5bfd1548-a6ef7962-7b00-495b-8e83-d7a08413e165-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 17:28:34 +0000
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Make the batch size of the percpu_counter
configurable
On Tue, 30 Apr 2013, Tim Chen wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 13:32 +0000, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > On Mon, 29 Apr 2013, Tim Chen wrote:
> >
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/percpu_counter.h b/include/linux/percpu_counter.h
> > > index d5dd465..5ca7df5 100644
> > > --- a/include/linux/percpu_counter.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/percpu_counter.h
> > > @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ struct percpu_counter {
> > > struct list_head list; /* All percpu_counters are on a list */
> > > #endif
> > > s32 __percpu *counters;
> > > + int *batch ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
> > > };
> >
> > What is this for and why does it have that alignmend?
>
> I was assuming that if batch is frequently referenced, it probably
> should not share a cache line with the counters field.
And why is it a pointer?
And the pointer is so frequently changed that it needs it own cache line?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists