[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1367346489.27102.185.camel@schen9-DESK>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 11:28:09 -0700
From: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Make the batch size of the percpu_counter
configurable
On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 11:10 -0700, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 09:23 -0700, Tim Chen wrote:
> > On Tue, 2013-04-30 at 13:32 +0000, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > > On Mon, 29 Apr 2013, Tim Chen wrote:
> > >
> > > > diff --git a/include/linux/percpu_counter.h b/include/linux/percpu_counter.h
> > > > index d5dd465..5ca7df5 100644
> > > > --- a/include/linux/percpu_counter.h
> > > > +++ b/include/linux/percpu_counter.h
> > > > @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ struct percpu_counter {
> > > > struct list_head list; /* All percpu_counters are on a list */
> > > > #endif
> > > > s32 __percpu *counters;
> > > > + int *batch ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
> > > > };
> > >
> > > What is this for and why does it have that alignmend?
> >
> > I was assuming that if batch is frequently referenced, it probably
> > should not share a cache line with the counters field.
>
> But 'counters' field has the same requirement. Its supposed to be read
> only field.
>
> So please remove this '____cacheline_aligned_in_smp', as it makes the
> whole struct percpu_counter at least two cache lines wide, for no
> obvious reason.
>
Will do.
Thanks.
Tim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists