[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130430185341.GB12389@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 20:53:41 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Jan Kratochvil <jan.kratochvil@...hat.com>,
Prasad <prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ptrace/x86: flush_ptrace_hw_breakpoint() shoule clear
the virtual debug registers
flush_ptrace_hw_breakpoint() destroys the counters set by ptrace, but
"leaks" ->debugreg6 and ->ptrace_dr7.
The problem is minor, but still it doesn't look right and flush_thread()
did this until 66cb5917. Now that PTRACE_DETACH does flush_ too this makes
even more sense.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
---
arch/x86/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c | 3 +++
1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/arch/x86/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
index 02f0763..f66ff16 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
@@ -393,6 +393,9 @@ void flush_ptrace_hw_breakpoint(struct task_struct *tsk)
unregister_hw_breakpoint(t->ptrace_bps[i]);
t->ptrace_bps[i] = NULL;
}
+
+ t->debugreg6 = 0;
+ t->ptrace_dr7 = 0;
}
void hw_breakpoint_restore(void)
--
1.5.5.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists