[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130430015840.GG22535@verge.net.au>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 10:58:40 +0900
From: Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bastian Hecht <hechtb+renesas@...il.com>,
Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@...esas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/21] ARM: shmobile: don't call irqchip_init
unconditionally
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 04:49:07PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 26 April 2013, Simon Horman wrote:
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/intc-r8a7740.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/intc-r8a7740.c
> > > index 8871f77..5dc57f1 100644
> > > --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/intc-r8a7740.c
> > > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/intc-r8a7740.c
> > > @@ -53,14 +53,23 @@ static void __init r8a7740_init_irq_common(void)
> > >
> > > void __init r8a7740_init_irq_of(void)
> > > {
> > > + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF))
> > > + return;
> > > +
> >
> > In other parts of the shmobile I believe that such code is
> > guarded by #ifdef CONFIG_OF and I believe not guarding this code in
> > some way was an oversight.
> >
> > The above change seems fine to me.
>
> Ok. The change that broke the code is only present in linux-next from
> one of your trees, but is not in arm-soc. Could you include the change
> in your tree, either by folding into one of your patches or adapting
> my patch appropriately?
Yes, or of course. I'll queue-up your patch with
the second hunk (below) removed.
> > > +
> > > + gic_dist_base = ioremap_nocache(0xc2800000, 0x1000);
> > > + gic_cpu_base = ioremap_nocache(0xc2000000, 0x1000);
> > >
> > > /* initialize the Generic Interrupt Controller PL390 r0p0 */
> > > gic_init(0, 29, gic_dist_base, gic_cpu_base);
> >
> > This one seems broken as the armadillo800eva board currently uses
> > it to initialise GIC even if CONFIG_ATAGS is not defined.
> >
> > I did test the above change on the armadillo800eva board
> > with the above change and CONFIG_ATAGS disabled, the result was
> > a boot failure. With the change reverted booting seems fine.
>
> Yes, I see my mistake now. The second change was clearly wrong
> as this function is also used for DT boards, not for ATAGS boards.
>
> Arnd
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists