linux-kernel - [PATCH 07/10] posix-cpu-timers: timer functions must use timer time instead of clock time

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 29 Apr 2013 23:17:15 -0400
From:	kosaki.motohiro@...il.com
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Olivier Langlois <olivier@...llion01.com>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH 07/10] posix-cpu-timers: timer functions must use timer time instead of clock time

From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>

For process timer, we use cpu_clock_sample_group() and cpu_timer_sample_group()
correctly. However for thread timer, we always use cpu_clock_sample().
That's wrong becuase cpu_clock_sample() account uncommited delta_exec too. And
this is inconsistency against run_posix_cpu_tiemrs().

This is not big matter because a following workaround code in
posix_cpu_timer_get() hides the timer miscalculation issue. However it makes
wrong rq lock held and would be better to fix.

  if (cpu_time_before(timer->it_clock, now, timer->it.cpu.expires)) {
    ...
  } else {
    /*
     * The timer should have expired already, but the firing
     * hasn't taken place yet.  Say it's just about to expire.
     */
     itp->it_value.tv_nsec = 1;
     itp->it_value.tv_sec = 0;

Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
---
 kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c |   37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c b/kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c
index 98f354e..c69b8d8 100644
--- a/kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c
+++ b/kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c
@@ -204,11 +204,10 @@ posix_cpu_clock_set(const clockid_t which_clock, const struct timespec *tp)
 }
 
 
-/*
- * Sample a per-thread clock for the given task.
- */
-static int cpu_clock_sample(const clockid_t which_clock, struct task_struct *p,
-			    union cpu_time_count *cpu)
+static int do_cpu_clock_timer_sample(const clockid_t which_clock,
+				     struct task_struct *p,
+				     bool add_delta,
+				     union cpu_time_count *cpu)
 {
 	switch (CPUCLOCK_WHICH(which_clock)) {
 	default:
@@ -220,12 +219,30 @@ static int cpu_clock_sample(const clockid_t which_clock, struct task_struct *p,
 		cpu->cpu = virt_ticks(p);
 		break;
 	case CPUCLOCK_SCHED:
-		cpu->sched = task_sched_runtime(p, true);
+		cpu->sched = task_sched_runtime(p, add_delta);
 		break;
 	}
 	return 0;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Sample a per-thread clock for the given task.
+ */
+static int cpu_clock_sample(const clockid_t which_clock, struct task_struct *p,
+			    union cpu_time_count *cpu)
+{
+	return do_cpu_clock_timer_sample(which_clock, p, true, cpu);
+}
+
+/*
+ * Sample a per-thread timer clock for the given task.
+ */
+static int cpu_timer_sample(const clockid_t which_clock, struct task_struct *p,
+			    union cpu_time_count *cpu)
+{
+	return do_cpu_clock_timer_sample(which_clock, p, false, cpu);
+}
+
 static void update_gt_cputime(struct task_cputime *a, struct task_cputime *b)
 {
 	if (b->utime > a->utime)
@@ -700,7 +717,7 @@ static int posix_cpu_timer_set(struct k_itimer *timer, int flags,
 	 * check if it's already passed.  In short, we need a sample.
 	 */
 	if (CPUCLOCK_PERTHREAD(timer->it_clock)) {
-		cpu_clock_sample(timer->it_clock, p, &val);
+		cpu_timer_sample(timer->it_clock, p, &val);
 	} else {
 		cpu_timer_sample_group(timer->it_clock, p, &val);
 	}
@@ -756,7 +773,7 @@ static int posix_cpu_timer_set(struct k_itimer *timer, int flags,
 		 * we need exact current time.
 		 */
 		if (CPUCLOCK_PERTHREAD(timer->it_clock))
-			now = val;
+			cpu_clock_sample(timer->it_clock, p, &now);
 		else
 			cpu_clock_sample_group(timer->it_clock, p, &now);
 		cpu_time_add(timer->it_clock, &new_expires, now);
@@ -844,7 +861,7 @@ static void posix_cpu_timer_get(struct k_itimer *timer, struct itimerspec *itp)
 	 * Sample the clock to take the difference with the expiry time.
 	 */
 	if (CPUCLOCK_PERTHREAD(timer->it_clock)) {
-		cpu_clock_sample(timer->it_clock, p, &now);
+		cpu_timer_sample(timer->it_clock, p, &now);
 		clear_dead = p->exit_state;
 	} else {
 		read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
@@ -1168,7 +1185,7 @@ void posix_cpu_timer_schedule(struct k_itimer *timer)
 	 * Fetch the current sample and update the timer's expiry time.
 	 */
 	if (CPUCLOCK_PERTHREAD(timer->it_clock)) {
-		cpu_clock_sample(timer->it_clock, p, &now);
+		cpu_timer_sample(timer->it_clock, p, &now);
 		bump_cpu_timer(timer, now);
 		if (unlikely(p->exit_state)) {
 			clear_dead_task(timer, now);
-- 
1.7.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/