[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1367291838-5490-10-git-send-email-kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2013 23:17:17 -0400
From: kosaki.motohiro@...il.com
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Olivier Langlois <olivier@...llion01.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH 09/10] sched: task_sched_runtime introduce micro optimization
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
rq lock in task_sched_runtime() is necessary for two reasons. 1)
accessing se.sum_exec_runtime is inatomic on 32bit and 2)
do_task_delta_exec() require it.
And then, 64bit can avoid holds rq lock when add_delta is false.
Signed-off-by: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 6 ++++++
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index b817e6d..24ba1c6 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -2657,6 +2657,12 @@ unsigned long long task_sched_runtime(struct task_struct *p, bool add_delta)
struct rq *rq;
u64 ns = 0;
+ /* Micro optimization. */
+#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
+ if (!add_delta)
+ return p->se.sum_exec_runtime;
+#endif
+
rq = task_rq_lock(p, &flags);
ns = p->se.sum_exec_runtime;
if (add_delta)
--
1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists