[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130501105357.GB19077@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 12:53:57 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] timer changes for v3.10
* Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 12:43 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > Please pull the latest timers-core-for-linus git tree from:
> >
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git timers-core-for-linus
>
> Hmm.. The "Use generic idle loop" patches from the SMP/hotplug pull
> conflicted with the "Use tick broadcast expired check" patches in this
> one for both x86 and ARM.
>
> Both sets of patches were done by Thomas, and I *really* want you guys
> to take a look at my conflict resolution. I effectively moved the new
> "don't go into deep idle if boradcast timer is pending" check from x86
> and arm into the generic idle loop. So my merge resolution is
> semantically quite different from either branch, but the alternative
> seemed to be to remove the new check entirely.
>
> I pushed my merge out, please take a look.
It looks good to me (in fact I missed that semantic conflict when I merged
these two myself :-/ ) - but it would be nice if Thomas double checked it
as well.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists