linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for May 1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 1 May 2013 13:22:23 +0200
From:	Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for May 1

On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Please do not add any v3.11 destined work to your linux-next included
> branches until after v3.10-rc1 is released.
>
> Changes since 20130430:
>
> The nfsd tree lost its build failure.
>
> The xfs tree lost its build failure.
>
> The vfs tree gained conflicts against Linus' and the powerpc trees and
> gained a build failure for which I applied a merge fix patch.
>
> The drm-intel tree gained a conflict against the drm tree.
>
> The block tree gained a conflict against Linus' tree.
>
> The arm-soc tree gained a conflict against the arm tree.
>
> The akpm tree lost a lot of patches that turned up elsewhere.
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
>

For several weeks this is one of a Linux-Next release with no serious
issues for me.

Thanks to all involved -next folks!

- Sedat -

View attachment "dmesg_3.9.0-next20130501-1-iniza-small_after-suspend-resume.txt" of type "text/plain" (111795 bytes)

Download attachment "3.9.0-next20130501-1-iniza-small.patch" of type "application/octet-stream" (1961 bytes)

Download attachment "config-3.9.0-next20130501-1-iniza-small" of type "application/octet-stream" (113197 bytes)