linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] Fix perf LBR filtering

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 1 May 2013 13:55:49 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	eranian@...gle.com, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Fix perf LBR filtering


* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:

> > I don't think you want to spend that many cycles in the NMI
> > handler for a dubious feature.  Ok in theory you could
> > add something with binary search, but that would be quite
> > a bit of effort and it would be probably challenging 
> > to do that all NMI safe.
> 
> If anyone using LBR sees that overhead it can be improved. You or others 
> who care can improve it.

Also, improving the performance of is_module_text() shouldn't be too hard: 
an RCU rbtree should be enough.

It's NMI-safe: when the rb-tree is in the middle of a rotation we'll 
simply not find the address and 'revert' to the worst case non-filtering 
your patch does all the time, but in the likely case it does find it and 
works as expected.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/