[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130501173035.GT3780@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 10:30:35 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>,
Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] sched: Add cond_resched_rcu_lock() helper
On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 06:57:49PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 09:02:18AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > My guess would be for the case where sched_preempt_enable_no_resched()
> > is followed some time later by cond_resched().
>
> I might hope not.. preempt_enable_no_resched() is nasty and you're likely to be
> hit with a frozen fish of sorts by tglx if you try to use it ;-)
I will stick with my guess, though I agree that if I am correct,
this situation almost certainly predates tglx's Linux-related use of
frozen fish as projectile weapons. ;-)
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists