[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51816525.7060305@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 14:55:33 -0400
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>
To: Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Olivier Langlois <olivier@...llion01.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] sched: task_sched_runtime introduce micro optimization
> Stronger:
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> + if (!p->on_cpu)
> + return p->se.sum_exec_runtime;
> +#endif
>
> [ Or !p->on_cpu || !add_delta ].
>
> We can take the racy read versus p->on_cpu since:
> If we race with it leaving cpu: we take lock, we're correct
> If we race with it entering cpu: unaccounted time ---> 0, this is
> indistinguishable from the read occurring a few cycles earlier.
OK, agreed. That's nice.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists