[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51817CBE.4050003@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 16:36:14 -0400
From: Christopher Covington <cov@...eaurora.org>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
CC: xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, linux@....linux.org.uk,
marc.zyngier@....com, catalin.marinas@....com,
konrad.wilk@...cle.com, will.deacon@....com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, john.stultz@...aro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] arm_arch_timer: introduce arch_timer_stolen_ticks
Hi Stefano,
On 05/01/2013 03:27 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Introduce a function, called arch_timer_stolen_ticks, called from the
> arch_timer interrupt handler to account for stolen ticks.
[...]
> diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch_timer.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch_timer.h
> index 7ade91d..30db413 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/include/asm/arch_timer.h
> +++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/arch_timer.h
> @@ -13,6 +13,11 @@
> int arch_timer_of_register(void);
> int arch_timer_sched_clock_init(void);
>
> +/* per-platform function to calculate stolen ticks (clock cycles stolen
> + * to the vcpu by the hypervisor).
Stolen from the vcpu by the hypervisor?
Is the hypervisor adjusting the Virtual Offset Register?
[...]
Thanks,
Christopher
--
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by the Linux Foundation.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists