[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1305011539010.8804@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 15:39:33 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Cody P Schafer <cody@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] mmzone: make holding lock_memory_hotplug() a
requirement for updating pgdat size
On Wed, 1 May 2013, Cody P Schafer wrote:
> They are also initialized at boot without pgdat_resize_lock(), if we consider
> boot time, quite a few of the statements on when locking is required are
> wrong.
>
> That said, you are correct that it is not strictly required to hold
> lock_memory_hotplug() when updating the fields in question because
> pgdat_resize_lock() is used.
>
I think you've confused node size fields with zone size fields.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists