linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/4] mmzone: note that node_size_lock should be manipulated via pgdat_resize

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1305011541260.8804@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date:	Wed, 1 May 2013 15:42:43 -0700 (PDT)
From:	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To:	Cody P Schafer <cody@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] mmzone: note that node_size_lock should be manipulated
 via pgdat_resize_lock()

On Wed, 1 May 2013, Cody P Schafer wrote:

> > > Signed-off-by: Cody P Schafer <cody@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > 
> > Nack, pgdat_resize_unlock() is unnecessary if irqs are known to be
> > disabled.
> > 
> 
> All this patch does is is indicate that rather than using node_size_lock
> directly (as it won't be around without CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG), one should use
> the pgdat_resize_[un]lock() helper macros.
> 

I think that's obvious given the lock is surrounded by
#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG.  The fact remains that hotplug code need not 
use pgdat_resize_lock() if irqs are disabled.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/