linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] mm: fixup changers of per cpu pageset's ->high and ->batch

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5181AB06.5080805@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Wed, 01 May 2013 16:53:42 -0700
From:	Cody P Schafer <cody@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@...yossef.com>,
	Simon Jeons <simon.jeons@...il.com>,
	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] mm: fixup changers of per cpu pageset's ->high
 and ->batch

On 04/10/2013 02:25 PM, Cody P Schafer wrote:
> On 04/10/2013 02:23 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>> On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 11:23:28 -0700 Cody P Schafer
>> <cody@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>>
>>> "Problems" with the current code:
>>>   1. there is a lack of synchronization in setting ->high and ->batch in
>>>      percpu_pagelist_fraction_sysctl_handler()
>>>   2. stop_machine() in zone_pcp_update() is unnecissary.
>>>   3. zone_pcp_update() does not consider the case where
>>> percpu_pagelist_fraction is non-zero
>>>
>>> To fix:
>>>   1. add memory barriers, a safe ->batch value, an update side mutex
>>> when
>>>      updating ->high and ->batch, and use ACCESS_ONCE() for ->batch
>>> users that
>>>      expect a stable value.
>>>   2. avoid draining pages in zone_pcp_update(), rely upon the memory
>>> barriers added to fix #1
>>>   3. factor out quite a few functions, and then call the appropriate
>>> one.
>>>
>>> Note that it results in a change to the behavior of
>>> zone_pcp_update(), which is
>>> used by memory_hotplug. I'm rather certain that I've diserned (and
>>> preserved)
>>> the essential behavior (changing ->high and ->batch), and only
>>> eliminated
>>> unneeded actions (draining the per cpu pages), but this may not be
>>> the case.
>>>
>>> Further note that the draining of pages that previously took place in
>>> zone_pcp_update() occured after repeated draining when attempting to
>>> offline a
>>> page, and after the offline has "succeeded". It appears that the
>>> draining was
>>> added to zone_pcp_update() to avoid refactoring setup_pageset() into 2
>>> funtions.
>>
>> There hasn't been a ton of review activity for this patchset :(
>>
>> I'm inclined to duck it until after 3.9.  Do the patches fix any
>> noticeably bad userspace behavior?
>
> No, all the bugs are theoretical. Waiting should be fine.
>

Andrew, do you want me to resend this patch set in the hope of obtaining 
more review? If so, when?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/