[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130501041731.GA24128@kroah.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 21:17:31 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>
Cc: Zoran Markovic <zoran.markovic@...aro.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Benoit Goby <benoit@...roid.com>,
Android Kernel Team <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
Todd Poynor <toddpoynor@...gle.com>,
San Mehat <san@...gle.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] drivers: power: Add watchdog timer to catch drivers
which lockup during suspend.
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 08:36:21PM -0700, Colin Cross wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 4:30 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 03:28:33PM -0700, Zoran Markovic wrote:
> >> From: Benoit Goby <benoit@...roid.com>
> >>
> >> Below is a patch from android kernel that detects a driver suspend
> >> lockup and captures dump in the kernel log. Please review and provide
> >> comments.
> >
> > There's this really cool thing called a watchdog driver that does stuff
> > like this :)
>
> If the watchdog driver worked in this case this patch wouldn't exist.
Great, let's fix the watchdog timer then :)
What's wrong with it?
> >> Rather than hard-lock the kernel, dump the suspend thread stack and
> >> BUG() when a driver takes too long to suspend. The timeout is set to
> >> 12 seconds to be longer than the usbhid 10 second timeout.
> >>
> >> Exclude from the watchdog the time spent waiting for children that
> >> are resumed asynchronously and time every device, whether or not they
> >> resumed synchronously.
> >
> > No, don't add a driver-core-only timer, use the existing watchdog timers
> > if you are worried about the kernel locking up.
>
> The watchdog timers are useless here. For one, they generally stop
> when their driver suspend op is called, so you may not even have one
> running when you lock up.
But you can fix that, right?
> More importantly, the purpose of this patch is to tell you which
> driver locked up and hopefully why, and the watchdog driver will
> usually result in a silent reset.
I thought it was an option as to what the watchdog does when it
triggers.
> This patch will cause a stack trace of the driver suspend op that is
> blocking suspend progress, even if that call does not happen in the
> suspend thread.
But who can see this, the machine is now dead.
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists