[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130501091108.GB10984@arm.com>
Date:	Wed, 1 May 2013 10:11:08 +0100
From:	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Cc:	Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	"arm@...nel.org" <arm@...nel.org>,
	Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/4] arm64: Move to generic sched_clock infrastructure
On Wed, May 01, 2013 at 01:54:35AM +0100, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Use the generic sched_clock infrastructure instead of rolling our
> own. This has the added benefit of fixing suspend/resume as
> outlined in 6a4dae5 (ARM: 7565/1: sched: stop sched_clock()
> during suspend, 2012-10-23) and correcting the timestamps when
> the hardware returns a value instead of 0 upon the first read.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
Looks ok.
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
