linux-kernel - Re: [GIT] Networking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFzinZSQAS6GW6vYOyQ06+GSMqkCGb8Fu829s_MxY0L0QA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 1 May 2013 21:37:38 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	hayeswang <hayeswang@...ltek.com>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT] Networking

On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 6:28 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> Lowlight: it completely breaks my machine with r8169 ethernet.  In the
> networkmanager applet, it claims no cable connection, which is a bit
> odd, because (a) it works with an older kernel and (b) the kernel
> messages actually say
>
>   r8169 0000:01:00.0 eth0: link up
>
> but nothing actually works.
>
>  r8169 Gigabit Ethernet driver 2.3LK-NAPI loaded
>  r8169 0000:01:00.0 eth0: RTL8168d/8111d at 0xffffc90010ece000,
> e0:cb:4e:95:1a:d7, XID 083000c0 IRQ 53
>  r8169 0000:01:00.0 eth0: jumbo features [frames: 9200 bytes, tx
> checksumming: ko]
>
> Any ideas?

Hmm. I bisected it.

And my machine is broken by commit 8ad227ff89a7 ("net: vlan: add
802.1ad support"). I booted several times just to make sure, and it's
consistent. The previous commit (86a9bad3ab6b) works fine, and
8ad227ff89a7 is broken.

I don't see what could be broken in that commit, and I'd *like* to
just revert it on top of current -git, but that causes problems
("error: ‘NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_STAG_TX_BIT’ undeclared"), so I can't just
do a straight revert to double-check with the current tree state. But
the bisection was very straightforward, and as mentioned, I checked
that boundary several times just because it looked so odd.

Maybe somebody who knows the code better just goes "Duh!". Anybody?

                Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/