[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130502123517.GL7800@kernel.dk>
Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 14:35:17 +0200
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@...el.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Lukas Czerner <lczerner@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] wait: fix false timeouts when using wait_event_timeout()
On Thu, May 02 2013, David Howells wrote:
> Imre Deak <imre.deak@...el.com> wrote:
>
> > Many callers of the wait_event_timeout() and
> > wait_event_interruptible_timeout() expect that the return value will be
> > positive if the specified condition becomes true before the timeout
> > elapses. However, at the moment this isn't guaranteed. If the wake-up
> > handler is delayed enough, the time remaining until timeout will be
> > calculated as 0 - and passed back as a return value - even if the
> > condition became true before the timeout has passed.
> >
> > Fix this by returning at least 1 if the condition becomes true. This
> > semantic is in line with what wait_for_condition_timeout() does; see
> > commit bb10ed09 - "sched: fix wait_for_completion_timeout() spurious
> > failure under heavy load".
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@...el.com>
>
> Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
You can add mine, too:
Acked-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists