[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5629971.jIvxpOF1A0@avalon>
Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 15:24:28 +0200
From: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
To: Prabhakar Lad <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
LMML <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...hat.com>,
DLOS <davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com>,
Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@....fi>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Rob Landley <rob@...dley.net>,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2] media: i2c: mt9p031: add OF support
Hi Prabhakar,
On Thursday 02 May 2013 18:48:37 Prabhakar Lad wrote:
> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Thursday 02 May 2013 12:34:25 Prabhakar Lad wrote:
> >> On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> >> > On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 11:52:34AM +0530, Prabhakar Lad wrote:
> >> >> From: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
> >> >>
> >> >> add OF support for the mt9p031 sensor driver.
> >> >> Alongside this patch sorts the header inclusion alphabetically.
[snip]
> >> >> @@ -1070,8 +1120,16 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id mt9p031_id[]
> >> >> = {
> >> >> };
> >> >> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, mt9p031_id);
> >> >>
> >> >> +static const struct of_device_id mt9p031_of_match[] = {
> >> >> + { .compatible = "aptina,mt9p031", },
> >> >> + { .compatible = "aptina,mt9p031m", },
> >> >> + {},
> >> >> +};
> >> >
> >> > I would have expected something like:
> >> >
> >> > static const struct of_device_id mt9p031_of_match[] = {
> >> > {
> >> > .compatible = "aptina,mt9p031-sensor",
> >> > .data = (void *)MT9P031_MODEL_COLOR,
> >> > }, {
> >> > .compatible = "aptina,mt9p031m-sensor",
> >> > .data = (void *)MT9P031_MODEL_MONOCHROME,
> >> > }, {
> >> > /* sentinel */
> >> > },
> >> > };
> >> >
> >> > of_id = of_match_device(mt9p031_of_match, &client->dev);
> >> > if (of_id)
> >> > mt9p031->model = (enum mt9p031_model)of_id->data;
> >> >
> >> > To handle monochrome sensors.
> >>
> >> OK will do the same.
> >
> > And please guard the table with #ifdef CONFIG_OF.
>
> But guarding the table #ifdef CONFIG_OF would cause compilation failure
> for below code when CONFIG_OF is undefined in probe
>
> of_id = of_match_device(of_match_ptr(mt9p031_of_match),
> &client->dev);
> if (of_id)
> mt9p031->model = (enum mt9p031_model)of_id->data;
You could guard the above code with an #ifdef CONFIG_OF as well.
> and also in mt9p031_i2c_driver structure,
> of_match_table = of_match_ptr(mt9p031_of_match),
>
> which force me to define mt9p031_of_match to NULL when
> CONFIG_OF is undefined
of_match_ptr is defined as NULL when CONFIG_OF is disabled.
--
Regards,
Laurent Pinchart
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists