[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1367518532.7757.14.camel@dcbw.foobar.com>
Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 13:15:32 -0500
From: Dan Williams <dcbw@...hat.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: mirqus@...il.com, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
hayeswang@...ltek.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT] Networking
On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 14:06 -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Date: Thu, 02 May 2013 13:55:42 -0400 (EDT)
>
> > From: Michał Mirosław <mirqus@...il.com>
> > Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 19:47:25 +0200
> >
> >> Are you sure it's "flags"? /sys/class/net/*/features were removed some
> >> time ago, and flags don't depend on NETIF_F_*.
> >
> > Oh, it's flags, which is printed in raw hex by net/core/net-sysfs.c:
> >
> > NETDEVICE_SHOW(flags, fmt_hex);
>
> Oh you're right, I'm confusing netdev->flags with netdev->features, my bad.
Was just going to ask about that. NM only cares about 'flags', not
features, at this point in time. Relevant code for carrier notification
in NM, using libnl helpers:
link_obj = (struct rtnl_link *) obj;
flags = rtnl_link_get_flags (link_obj);
ifidx = rtnl_link_get_ifindex (link_obj);
nm_log_dbg (LOGD_HW, "netlink link message: iface idx %d flags 0x%X",
ifidx, flags);
if (flags & IFF_LOWER_UP)
g_signal_emit (self, signals[CARRIER_ON], 0, ifidx);
else
g_signal_emit (self, signals[CARRIER_OFF], 0, ifidx);
So it's got to be something else other than the netdev features ordering
that's screwing up for Linus. I'm sure we'd have heard about it a long,
long time ago if something had messed up dev->flags bits...
Dan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists