| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20130502182812.GD14496@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Date: Thu, 2 May 2013 19:28:12 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk> To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, "xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>, "rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 0/2] (arm-soc for v3.10) arm: introduce psci_smp_ops On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 06:20:32PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Thu, 2 May 2013, Will Deacon wrote: > > Hi Stefano, > > > > On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 06:12:12PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > ping > > > > Is this a ping to have this pulled into Russell's tree? > > I thought that we agreed that the patches should go via the arm-soc > tree, after Russell acks them. Okay, well, is there a reason for them to go through arm-soc? They look more like core code to me than SoC specific - they only minimally touch mach-virt. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists