linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] optimize freezing tasks by reducing task wakeups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 02 May 2013 23:06:35 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Colin Cross <ccross@...roid.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	arve@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] optimize freezing tasks by reducing task wakeups

On Wednesday, May 01, 2013 06:34:58 PM Colin Cross wrote:
> On slow cpus the large number of task wakeups and context switches
> triggered by freezing and thawing tasks can take a significant amount
> of cpu time.  This patch series reduces the amount of work done during
> freezing tasks by avoiding waking up tasks that are already in a freezable
> state.
> 
> The first patch reduces the wasted time in try_to_freeze_tasks() by
> starting with a 1 ms sleep during the first loop and backing off
> up to an 8 ms sleep if all tasks are not frozen.
> 
> The second patch modifies the freeze_task() function to skip tasks
> that have set the PF_FREEZER_SKIP flag by calling freezer_do_not_count().
> These tasks will not enter the refrigerator during the suspend/resume
> cycle unless they woken up by something else, in which case they will
> enter the refrigerator in freezer_count() before they access any
> resources that would not be available in suspend or deadlock with
> another freezing/frozen task.
> 
> The rest of the series adds a few more freezable helpers and converts the
> top call sites that userspace tasks are usually blocked at to freezable
> helpers.  The list of call sites was collected on a Nexus 10 (ARM Exynos
> 5250 SoC), but all the top call sites other than binder show up at the
> top of the list on Ubuntu x86-64 as well.
> 
> This series cuts the time for freezing tasks from 50 ms to 5 ms when
> the cpu speed is locked at its lowest setting (200MHz), and reduces
> the number of context switches and restarted syscalls from 1000 to
> 25.
> 
> v2 moves the skip check to freeze_task(), and expands the commit
> messages.

The entire series makes sense to me, so are there any objections?

Tejun, Oleg??

Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/