linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/4] ACPI / processor: Use common hotplug infrastructure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1367536812.16154.178.camel@misato.fc.hp.com>
Date:	Thu, 02 May 2013 17:20:12 -0600
From:	Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com,
	vasilis.liaskovitis@...fitbricks.com, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] ACPI / processor: Use common hotplug infrastructure

On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 14:31 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> 
> Split the ACPI processor driver into two parts, one that is
> non-modular, resides in the ACPI core and handles the enumeration
> and hotplug of processors and one that implements the rest of the
> existing processor driver functionality.
> 
> The non-modular part uses an ACPI scan handler object to enumerate
> processors on the basis of information provided by the ACPI namespace
> and to hook up with the common ACPI hotplug infrastructure.  It also
> populates the ACPI handle of each processor device having a
> corresponding object in the ACPI namespace, which allows the driver
> proper to bind to those devices, and makes the driver bind to them
> if it is readily available (i.e. loaded) when the scan handler's
> .attach() routine is running.
> 
> There are a few reasons to make this change.
> 
> First, switching the ACPI processor driver to using the common ACPI
> hotplug infrastructure reduces code duplication and size considerably,
> even though a new file is created along with a header comment etc.
> 
> Second, since the common hotplug code attempts to offline devices
> before starting the (non-reversible) removal procedure, it will abort
> (and possibly roll back) hot-remove operations involving processors
> if cpu_down() returns an error code for one of them instead of
> continuing them blindly (if /sys/firmware/acpi/hotplug/force_remove
> is unset).  That is a more desirable behavior than what the current
> code does.
> 
> Finally, the separation of the scan/hotplug part from the driver
> proper makes it possible to simplify the driver's .remove() routine,
> because it doesn't need to worry about the possible cleanup related
> to processor removal any more (the scan/hotplug part is responsible
> for that now) and can handle device removal and driver removal
> symmetricaly (i.e. as appropriate).
> 
> Some user-visible changes in sysfs are made (for example, the
> 'sysdev' link from the ACPI device node to the processor device's
> directory is gone and a 'physical_node' link is present instead,
> a 'firmware_node' link is present in the processor device's
> directory, the processor driver is now visible under
> /sys/bus/cpu/drivers/ and bound to the processor device), but
> that shouldn't affect the functionality that users care about
> (frequency scaling, C-states and thermal management).

This looks very nice.  I have one question below.

> Tested on my venerable Toshiba Portege R500.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/Makefile           |    1 
>  drivers/acpi/acpi_processor.c   |  473 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/acpi/glue.c             |    6 
>  drivers/acpi/internal.h         |    3 
>  drivers/acpi/processor_driver.c |  803 +++-------------------------------------
>  drivers/acpi/scan.c             |    1 
>  drivers/base/cpu.c              |   11 
>  include/acpi/processor.h        |    5 
>  8 files changed, 574 insertions(+), 729 deletions(-)

 :

> Index: linux-pm/drivers/base/cpu.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/base/cpu.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/base/cpu.c
> @@ -13,11 +13,21 @@
>  #include <linux/gfp.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
>  #include <linux/percpu.h>
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
>  
>  #include "base.h"
>  
>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct device *, cpu_sys_devices);
>  
> +static int cpu_subsys_match(struct device *dev, struct device_driver *drv)
> +{
> +	/* ACPI style match is the only one that may succeed. */
> +	if (acpi_driver_match_device(dev, drv))

Can you explain why this change is needed?  Do CPU devices still behave
the same on non-ACPI systems?  

Thanks,
-Toshi


> +		return 1;
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
>  static int cpu_subsys_online(struct device *dev)
>  {
> @@ -76,6 +86,7 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR(release, S_IWUSR, NUL
>  struct bus_type cpu_subsys = {
>  	.name = "cpu",
>  	.dev_name = "cpu",
> +	.match = cpu_subsys_match,
>  #ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
>  	.online = cpu_subsys_online,
>  	.offline = cpu_subsys_offline,
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/