[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1305031024080.1657@ja.ssi.bg>
Date: Fri, 3 May 2013 10:52:36 +0300 (EEST)
From: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, lvs-devel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>,
Dipankar Sarma <dipankar@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] sched: Add cond_resched_rcu_lock() helper
Hello,
On Thu, 2 May 2013, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> mainline, and missed the one that you added. Revisiting that, a
> question:
>
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
> > +#define PREEMPT_RCU_OFFSET 1
>
> Does this really want to be "1" instead of PREEMPT_OFFSET?
In this case when CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU is enabled
we (RCU) do not touch the preempt counters. Instead, the units
are accounted in current->rcu_read_lock_nesting:
#define rcu_preempt_depth() (current->rcu_read_lock_nesting)
__rcu_read_lock:
current->rcu_read_lock_nesting++;
and the path is __might_sleep -> preempt_count_equals ->
rcu_preempt_depth
For now both places do not use PREEMPT_OFFSET:
- #define inc_preempt_count() add_preempt_count(1)
- __rcu_read_lock: current->rcu_read_lock_nesting++;
so, ... it does not matter much for me. In short,
the trick is in preempt_count_equals() where preempt_offset
is a combination of preempt count and RCU preempt depth:
#ifdef CONFIG_PREEMPT_RCU
#define PREEMPT_RCU_OFFSET (0 /* preempt */ + 1 /* RCU */)
#else
#define PREEMPT_RCU_OFFSET (PREEMPT_CHECK_OFFSET + 0 /* RCU */)
#endif
Let me know for your preference about this definition...
Regards
--
Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists