[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51837B43.1020804@intel.com>
Date: Fri, 03 May 2013 16:54:27 +0800
From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
arjan@...ux.intel.com, bp@...en8.de, pjt@...gle.com,
namhyung@...nel.org, efault@....de, morten.rasmussen@....com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, len.brown@...el.com,
rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com, jkosina@...e.cz,
clark.williams@...il.com, tony.luck@...el.com,
keescook@...omium.org, mgorman@...e.de, riel@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] sched: use runnable load based balance
On 05/03/2013 03:55 PM, Alex Shi wrote:
> Just find a benchmark named as pthread_cond_broadcast.
> http://kristiannielsen.livejournal.com/13577.html. will play with it. :)
>> >
I tried the pthread_cond_broadcast with/without my latest patchset,
seems no clear performance change.
without the patch, finished 30000 threads need 0.39 ~ 0.49 seconds in
ten times testing,
with the patch, finished 30000 thread need 0.38 ~ 0.47 seconds in ten
times testing.
I try to give more threads in testing, but when thread number increased
to 40000, the testing become extremely slow and gdb find it busy on
thread creating.
[New Thread 0x7fe470411700 (LWP 24629)]
[New Thread 0x7fe470512700 (LWP 24628)]
[New Thread 0x7fe470613700 (LWP 24627)]
[New Thread 0x7fe470714700 (LWP 24626)]
--
Thanks
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists